Using physical obstructions, shields, and vehicles to block access to sensitive areas.
Its authors were a secretive committee of senior police officers, military liaison officers (with counter-insurgency experience), and Home Office civil servants. Their goal was brutally simple:
POMAN 1971 has been criticized for its perceived bias towards a more authoritarian approach to public order policing. Some argue that the manual's guidelines were overly restrictive and led to the use of excessive force by police officers. Others have criticized the manual for failing to adequately protect the rights of protesters and demonstrators. public order manual poman 1971
that frequently ground critical infrastructure to a halt.
Following significant civil disturbances in the late 1960s, notably the events of 1969, the Malaysian government recognized the need for a comprehensive, unified approach to public order. The POMAN 1971 was established to: Using physical obstructions, shields, and vehicles to block
: Framing tactics as a continuation of "traditional" English policing to maintain public consent, even as methods became more paramilitary. Evolution and Modern Status
: Grants the police authority to regulate, license, or ban public assemblies, processions, and meetings. Some argue that the manual's guidelines were overly
POMAN 1971 revolutionized the physical mechanics of crowd control. It moved policing away from uncoordinated skirmishes toward highly synchronized, military-style formations. 1. Crowd Segmentation and Containment